The project aimed to rapidly identify priority topic uncertainties as a first step to identify future systematic review questions of pertinence to key international faecal incontinence (FI) stakeholders (patients, carers, healthcare professionals, policy makers and voluntary, community or social enterprise representatives). The paper aim is to share our methods, experience and learning with other groups planning to deliver a rapid priority setting exercise.
A rapid priority setting exercise combining existing, emergent evidence with stakeholder knowledge identified broad topic uncertainties
Methods used to identify priority areas for systematic reviews in faecal incontinence